Thursday, 4th May 2017
By, GBS Corporate Training
#SituationalLeadership #GeneralElection #Leadership
Conservative Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, used a more autocratic Leadership style, through which she succeeded in championing and implementing her sometimes controversial policies. However this Leadership style ultimately led to her being ousted as Prime Minister by members of her own cabinet and parliamentary party.
“I suppose Leadership at one time meant muscles, but today it means getting along with people.” Mahatma Gandhi
The two party political Leaders into the final round of the French election have contrasting Leadership styles. According to the Express Newspaper, Emmanuel Macron presents more 'old-style top-down' Leadership, typical of many French leaders, quoted as saying “in two weeks’ time I hope to become your President”, suggesting his ambition is on attaining position/ power.
There are only 6 weeks until the UK general election, and the Leadership styles of the Prime Minister and leader of the opposition could not be more different. The Guardian reports that aides to the Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, believe the public will be won round the more they are exposed to Corbyn’s warmer and more collegiate Leadership style, and his belief he must act in “empowering others to make up their minds and come on board when they are ready”.
A recent profile of Theresa May in The Economist says ‘her vision of Leadership is focused on giving statements, installing processes, gathering up information and control’ suggesting a much more autocratic style of Leadership.
“In the past a Leader was a Boss. Today’s Leaders can no longer lead solely based on positional power.” Ken Blanchard
Consideration of past and present political Leaders displays a variety of Leadership styles so it might be argued that their style is not the key factor of whether they win an election or not. Perhaps a more important question is whether the Leadership style that they adopt gets results.
This is a critical question for businesses, and according to Situational Leadership theory, there are no good or bad leadership styles, only those that are appropriate for the given situation of task and people.
Deployed in more than 70% of Fortune 500 companies, the Situational Leadership® approach transcends cultural and generational differences and equips Leaders around the globe with the skills necessary to address specific challenges, drive behaviour change and increase productivity.
“A Situational Leader is anybody anywhere who recognises that influencing behaviour is not an event, but a process.” Dr. Paul Hersey
Situational Leadership is an adaptive leadership framework, based on the relationship between Leaders (Managers) and followers (staff). The model encourages Leaders to analyse specific business situations based on the:
The approach encourages Leaders to take stock of their team members, weigh the many variables in their workplace and choose the Leadership style that best fits their goals and circumstances.
Successful Leaders have the insight to understand when to change their management style and what leadership strategy fits each new paradigm.
Hersey suggests that Leaders should match their Leadership style to the development level of the person, or people, being led. The Leadership model describes development levels in terms of the follower's competence (ability) and commitment (willingness). So, Situational Leadership is about the extent to which followers are able and willing, as well as the style that the Leader adopts.
In the Business environment, as well as in the political environment, Leaders that are successful are those that are able to assess situations correctly, select and apply the appropriate Leadership and Management style, and then continuously review their choice.
GBS provides a series of Situational Leadership training courses related to different applications of the model. We help Leaders to learn to appropriately balance their task direction with proper relationship behaviour, which helps to maintain high levels of consistent performance across team members.